Thursday, November 21, 2013

But enough about me, let

Review: 'Mission Impossible: Phantom Mode "(Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol) |
Some of the biggest crap ever produced in Hollywood are fourth parts. Their main function is to degrade the value of the preceding them series / hint: "Pirates of the Caribbean 4 '/ pissing on kultovostta of characters / hint:" september birthstone Die Hard 4 "/ and interfere with the health of loyal fans. / Hint: "Indiana Jones 4" / In all cases, viewers finally remain disappointed by a child who has just realized that "Snow White" is just a stage name of a stripper neighborhood ones. So when I learned that labile follower of Scientology Tom Cruise has undertaken to make the fourth part of "M: I", suddenly started screaming, ignoring the surprised looks of other people in the restaurant. Abrams had just washed the shame of leagues John Woo / more John Boooo! / And I could not understand why anyone september birthstone would want to spoil the aging Rahal Ethan Hunt. But here's the surprise - "M: I 4 'is the rare breed of" working part four. " Of those who had been done that do not irritate and are raising the level of the franchise, and not push it.
15 years and two sequels september birthstone after classic Brian De Palma, have "phantom mode" - the best summer hit of 2011, which ironically was released in the winter. In spite of my initial expectations, the lower and the growth of Tom Cruise, viewing apathy and glut of morons september birthstone blokbusteri, "M: I 4" delivers exactly september birthstone what you need - first class entertainment with no pretensions. Quartet is a much more direct for three, rather than the couple was the unit and if you imagine that the couple does not exist, then by "M: I" is not a bad one gets trilogy. After the recent failures of the Cruise / "Operation: Valkyrie" and "real scam" / "M: I 4 'is the equivalent of saving Trash o'er his career and Cruz grabs stick with both hands. One hand grabs her by actor reprises doubtful pranas breeches Uber Agent Ethan Hunt, and the other - as a producer, since even before the title will see how this is "Tom Cruise Production" and it is written in large letters, killed, complexes.
Tom's leadership position as a producer in the film becomes a quality 130-minute september birthstone trailer of Scientology and when I say "advertising" mean advertising. / You get what you thought I meant? / Most scenes are specially selected to emphasize his ability to run and climb. Now that I think about it, Cruz did almost nothing in "M: I 4" but to run and climb, but what is more important - does it quite convincingly, as if all the time imagined how Katie Holmes at his heels. Cruz has taken full control of AK cruise control and actually had a lot more power over decisions than meekly Brad Bird, and put on the director's stool. Not that Bird is responsible for some of the visual moments "M: I 4 ', but the primary role of Cruise - in front of and behind the camera. Speaking Bird, let's go with it. Excluding chicken his family, the man became famous with his childhood epic of "Pixar" september birthstone - great family adventure september birthstone "The Incredibles" and the fable of smelly kitchen rat "Ratatouille" with a large ... (censored) Although fair I doubt that the mouth of Bird will not be able take fatty morsel, Brad surprises with his skills directing old school action, which has everything you need - dynamic tension and even self-irony. Well, there are a lot of things that you need, but it then - let's be positive five seconds. Byrd should september birthstone give some lessons of Michael Bay for how to make watchable action which contains more than Shia LaBeouf and slow motion in itself, but the truth is that Bay does not deserve september birthstone such kindness. With "M: I 4 'dude definitely gives orders to become a stable name directorial front after this hit start, I expect his next project with a humble september birthstone look.
But enough about me, let's get back to the "phantom mode". From the first minute makes it clear that "M: I 4" very much wants to be seen as a Bond movie - opening credits are presented through a montage of stylized shots of the main events and places in history amid progressive september birthstone burning september birthstone wick that combines classic "M: I" with the classic Bond-s, though not very successfully, september birthstone in my / no / humble september birthstone opinion. On getting worse - the story slowly but surely september birthstone sdava luggage, centered september birthstone on all sorts of gadgets and devices removed from the wet dreams of Q, which receive more screen time and the characters themselves. "M: I 4 'is a film in which spy gadgets dancing actual spies - in places they are even more interesting to watch than focus their eyes on Ethan Hunt or wooden figurehead Jeremy Renner, and that's a pity. The tragedy is that as much as he tries to imitation, "M: I 4 'is nothing september birthstone more than a lite version of Bond. I do not want to repeat myself, but if so I wanted to look lite version of Bond, U.S.

No comments:

Post a Comment